Tag Archives: Dinwiddie Virginia Criminal Lawyer

Using Radar Defense With Lidar Dinwiddie Virginia

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by in Dinwiddie Virginia Traffic Laws

≈ Comments Off on Using Radar Defense With Lidar Dinwiddie Virginia

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Using Radar Calibration Defense With Lidar – Virginia Lawyers

If you are dealing with a Lidar based charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Using Radar Calibration Defense With Lidar In Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary

experience to assist you with this matter.

Using Radar Defense With Lidar Richmond Lawyers Virginia Felony Motor Vehicle

Michael v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Dinwiddie (Virginia) that entered judgment in favor of appellee in an action alleging that

after appellant had been judged a habitual offender, he drove in such a manner as to endanger the life, limb, or property of another, a violation of Va. Code Ann. §

46.2-357(B)(2). With no proof as to whether the officer has caught the Appellant, using radar (Lidar), the Appellant took the defense that there was no evidence in the

record as to appellant’s actually driving.

If you are facing a criminal case in Dinwiddie, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-

7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:
  • The reviewing court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible

    therefrom

  • Under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-357(B)(2) any person found to be an habitual offender under this article, who is thereafter convicted of driving a motor vehicle

    while the revocation determination is in effect shall be guilty of a felony if such driving of itself endangers the life, limb, or property of another or takes place

    while such person is in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, irrespective of whether the driving of itself endangers the life, limb or property of another and one of

    the offender’s underlying convictions is for Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-36.1, 18.2-266 or a parallel local ordinance

  • The reviewing court will not reverse the judgment of the trial court unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.

Using Radar Calibration Defense With Lidar In Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary

experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-804-201-9009

Virginia State Law Dinwiddie Reckless Driving

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by in Dinwiddie Virginia Reckless Driving Laws

≈ Comments Off on Virginia State Law Dinwiddie Reckless Driving

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Reckless Driving State Law – Virginia Lawyers

If you have been charged with a violation of reckless driving state law in Virginia and you are concerned about a conviction,

contact our law firm immediately for help.

Reckless driving state law in Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary

experience to assist you with this matter.

Shawn v. Commonwealth

Facts:

The driver of a car was killed when it was struck by a police cruiser during a high-speed chase to apprehend defendant. The Court of

Appeals of Virginia State affirmed defendant’s conviction for involuntary manslaughter. The present court awarded defendant an appeal, in which he argued that there

was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Since defendant had not assigned error to the Court of Appeals’ holding that his driving conduct was criminally

negligent, that holding was binding on appeal. Proximate causation was the only remaining issue. Because defendant’s actions put into operation the high-speed chase,

the officer’s intervening actions were not a superseding cause that alone caused the driver’s death

If you are facing a criminal case in Dinwiddie, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-

7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:
  • The Supreme Court of Virginia has defined criminal negligence with reference to gross negligence. Gross negligence is punishable as criminal negligence

    when acts of a wanton or willful character, committed or omitted, show a reckless or indifferent disregard of the rights of others, under circumstances reasonably

    calculated to produce injury, or which make it not improbable that injury will be occasioned, and the offender knows, or is charged with the knowledge of, the probable

    result of his acts. To convict a defendant of involuntary manslaughter based on such acts of criminal negligence, the Commonwealth must also prove that the defendant’s

    criminally negligent conduct was a proximate cause of the victim’s death

  • When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court considers the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the

    prevailing party in the circuit court, and the appellate court accords the Commonwealth the benefit of all reasonable inferences deducible from the evidence.

Reckless driving state law in Virginia.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary

experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-804-201-9009